Thursday’s Tome: Grammar Edition

Oftentimes we go about our business assuming that we know everything necessary to write and explain our arguments.  The thought never crosses our minds that perhaps we still have a few things to learn, or at least a few tricks to remember.  Today, we hosted a Wordsmith Workshop on grammar and ESL here at the Law Library.  The presentation slides can be found here:  Grammar & ESL Presentation.

During this workshop, we discussed numerous aspects of the English language, especially as they pertain to legal writing.  While many of us simply brush off these finer points of grammar as something we already learned in elementary school, it is surprisingly easy to forget those basic tools we learned so long ago.  For example, many students and lawyers writing today fail to utilize transition words or phrases, which assist the reader in connecting thoughts and arguments throughout the document.  Furthermore, authors often forget to whom they are writing and focus solely on making their argument rather than presenting the argument in such a way as to best aid and impress their target audience.  For example, when writing a legal brief or memo, the author should focus on clarity and conciseness, thereby expressing the argument and supporting law as clearly and briefly as possible.  By utilizing concise writing, an author can better hold the reader’s attention as well as present the contents of the argument in an easy to follow and succinct manner.

Additional points of grammar to remember involve such basic concepts as avoiding double negatives and contractions, utilizing subject-verb agreement, ensuring your writing is active rather than passive, and remembering to check commonly misspelled or misused words such as their and there or it’s and its.  While these points may seem like common sense to many authors, the amount of common mistakes authors make may surprise you.  As our presenter pointed out today, an author should spend 2/3 of their overall time spent on any single document editing and proofreading it rather than merely writing it.  This means that the amount of time spent writing a brief or an article should triple for the editing and proofreading time.  Oftentimes authors fail to check for common mistakes or errors that their spell-check will not catch, and these errors slip through the cracks and into the finished product.  While these errors may not seem vastly important, a superfluous amount of them can detract from the overall credibility of the author and, therefore, their writing.  While editing, keep a weather eye out for these often overlooked mistakes.  Reading your work aloud is a great way to catch errors.

Ultimately, your main focus in legal writing is content and ensuring that your argument is persuasive and beneficial to your client.  You can achieve this goal more easily, however, by utilizing correct grammar and transitional language to help your reader as much as possible.

Thursday’s Tome: The Power of the Law Review

As a law student, I’m sure you’ve heard of or read various law review articles in your lifetime.  But where did the law review begin?  What is its purpose?  Why do students try so hard to join their school’s law review?  Why are law review articles important?  How have they affected the legal world?

The first law review published in the United States of America was the University of Pennsylvania Law Review.  According to their website, “Founded in 1852 as the American Law Register, the University of Pennsylvania Law Review is the nation’s oldest law review. In the 2014-2015 academic year, the Law Review will publish its 163rd volume.”  Now there are numerous law reviews published by a multitude of law schools nationwide.  

The Ave Maria School of Law Law Review is dedicated to:  

  • Promoting excellence in the presentation of legal scholarship in all areas of the law in order to be an authoritative and reliable source for the research needs of lawyers, judges, professors, and students.
  • Developing the scholarly writing and technical skills of its members through active involvement in the writing, editing, and production of an excellent legal journal.
  • Engaging the whole legal community in thoughtful dialogue on the entire spectrum of legal issues, while affirming the Catholic legal tradition, built upon the foundation of faith and reason.
As these goals indicate, the purpose of a law review is multifaceted.  The members of a law review seek to discover, edit, and publish articles on relevant legal scholarship nationwide as they approach topics and issues that the legal world faces today.  Their goal is providing information and insight into these issues in order to assist with the determining of the best outcome.  Furthermore, law review members (from the associate editors to the editor-in-chief) all develop their writing and technical skills as they develop the articles being published each volume.  Finally, a law review has the unique opportunity to engage the legal community on an intellectual level while discussing the legal and oftentimes moral issues facing our nation today.

Typically, students going into their 2L year apply to join the law review.  Most (but not all) law reviews conduct a write-on competition where the applicants must prepare and submit a writing sample, such as a closed memo, which is evaluated by the current executive board in order to determine which students will make the cut.  Having Law Review on your resume can greatly boost your chances in the job market.  “A potential employer who sees Law Review on your resume knows that you have been through rigorous training, and will likely think that you are intelligent and have a strong work ethic, eye for detail, and good writing skills.” (about: education)  The workload of a law review editor is intense; however, the skills developed as a law review editor are well worth the stress and exertion it takes to succeed.

But that still doesn’t explain the relative utility of law review articles to the legal world.  Are they only read by intellectuals and professors?  By philosophers and other students?  Or do they have a real impact on the legal world and our laws?  According to Benjamin Cardozo, “Judges and advocates may not relish the admission, but the sobering truth is that leadership in the march of legal thought has been passing in our day from the benches of the courts to the chairs of universities . . . . [T]he outstanding fact here is that academic scholarship is charting the line of development and progress in the untrodden regions of the law.”  According to the Wall Street Journal, some of the most cited articles have been cited over 3000 times.  While law review articles remain only secondary sources and, therefore, persuasive authority, they are often referenced, reviewed, and even cited by attorneys, judges, and legislators in their legal work as explanatory for a specific issue or area of law.

As a parting note of joviality, watch this video for the “real story” of the law review (skip the first 47 seconds to get to the song).

Thursday’s Tome


I’ve discussed the Bluebook before, but I wanted to reiterate a few things based on a workshop we hosted at the Library earlier this week.  

Firstly, while many people may not think citations are that important in the grand scheme of things, they can make more of a difference than you might first imagine.  According to this website, “In a Vermont Case, In re Shepperson, 674 A.2d 1273 (1996), an attorney repeatedly submitted briefs to the courts during a seven-year period that contained “numerous citation errors that made identification of cases difficult, cited cases for irrelevant or incomprehensible reasons, made legal arguments without citation to authority, and inaccurately represented the law contained in the cited cases.” One brief in particular was more than 90 pages long, and the judge noted that the attorney “fail[ed] to raise a legitimate legal issue or cite a single authority in support of his arguments.” The attorney appealed a lower court’s decision that he attend a six-month tutorial program designed to improve his skills. The appeals court suspended him for “not less than six months” and “until he has demonstrated to the satisfaction of the court that he is fit to practice law.””  

Secondly, while the Bluebook is notoriously dense, it does include rules for practically every citation.  Granted, you may need to be creative if you’re working on a law review note that uses ancient or little known sources; however, you should be able to (with patience and persistence) sort through the rules and piece together what you need.

Thirdly, when it comes to Bluebooking, don’t be afraid to use the Index in the back or ask your local law librarian for guidance.

Finally, remember to breathe.  As an attorney, you’re trying to fight for your client, but you are also making an impression on the people around you.  By utilizing proper citations, you can impress the judge with your attention to detail, which can assist your work and legal arguments.

Fruit of Thy Womb

Aspiring to holiness one sanctification at a time through the vocation of motherhood.

Law Blog

WSJ on the cases, trends and personalities of interest to the business community.

Law School Success

Making the most of your experience as a law student

Above the Law

A Legal Web Site – News, Insights, and Opinions on Law Firms, Lawyers, Law School, Law Suits, Judges and Courts

SCOTUSblog

A library is not a luxury but one of the necessities of life.